Sunday, October 18, 2009

Exhibit | Edward Burtynsky: Oil


Photo: Edward Burtynsky

This afternoon I saw the new Edward Burtynsky exhibit at the Corcoran Gallery here in Washington DC. This is a very memorable exhibit and I'm reminded once again how lucky we are to have the Corcoran and Paul Roth working to bring large-scale contemporary photography exhibits to DC.

The exhibit consists of about 55 landscapes, most of them very large prints (four feet or more on a side). Many are aerial shots (taken from a helicopter) and these are hung fairly low so the viewer can really "step into" the image and float above the landscapes.

The theme of the exhibit is oil, from its extraction and refinement to its use, its effect on our built environment and culture, and its eventual residue in the form of waste products and derelict infrastructure. The theme is strong enough that even someone with no interest in photography would enjoy the exhibit; it would make a great introduction to one kind of contemporary photography.

Although the theme is potentially political, Burtynsky produces images with no visible sense of irony, condescension, or call to action. This is not to say that the images are purely "documentary"; rather, they convey the photographer's sense of awe at the sheer scale of both grandeur and folly found in these human-made industrial and urban landscapes. I get the sense that Burtynsky would approach an aerial photo of an oil refinery vs. Niagara Falls -- or of a school of fish vs. a trash heap -- with much the same reverence and attention to detail.

The exhibit shows the power of large format photography to "make real" information that we know as statistics (so many billion barrels of oil, etc.) but can't really grasp. It reminded me a bit of Chris Jordan's use of large photorealistic images to convey large numbers. But the longer I look at Burtynsky's photos, the more the scale and repetitive detail (of both the human artifacts represented and the photos themselves) overwhelms my comprehension and leaves me feeling like I'm looking at a natural force.

In the end, I can no more really comprehend what's going on here than I can comprehend leaves in a forest or grains of sand on a beach. At a certain scale -- at the scale of these landscapes -- the human-made, no matter how repulsive, starts to look organic again. A quarry in the foreground mirrors a mountain in the background, with an encrustation of subarban houses between them.

There's also much to see and admire in terms of technique in Burtynsky's photos. For example, the aerial photos show slightly selective focus that pops out the crisper foreground, lets the every-so-slightly-more-blurred background recede, and adds enormously to the depth of the images. In other shots the focus is perfectly even, as in a landscape of discarded tires that seems to rise up to swamp the viewer (even though it is actually receding) because the most distant tires are as sharp as the closest. In some shots the desert is so beautifully lit and exposed that one can almost ignore that it's infested with oil pumps; in another shot the sea and sky are so similar in tone that an oil platform almost floats in mid-air.

I would call it a must-see. But if you can't make it by December 13, these images are also available in Burtynsky's latest book, not yet release on Amazon but available in the Corcoran bookstore along with several of his other books (including Manufactured Landscapes).

Exhibit details

Monday, September 21, 2009

Tech | Choosing a digital camera (DSLR)

Recently lots of people seem to be asking me, "what digital camera should I buy?" So here's a summary of my advice on digital SLRs. This assumes that you've already decided to buy a DSLR, and not a compact digital camera, for any of the following reasons:
  • You'd like to be able to switch lenses and possibly upgrade your lenses later
  • You want faster focus and operation for moving subjects such as children or sports
  • DSLRs produce higher quality images for larger prints, especially in low light
There are several companies making DSLRs today (Canon, Fujifilm, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, Sony) and all told they offer about 30-40 models of DSLR. Where to begin?

In this post I'll focus on just the two leading manufacturers, Canon and Nikon. Other companies make some perfectly good DSLRs, but it makes sense to stick with the leaders because they offer the widest range of cameras and compatible lenses, release new cameras frequently, and compete closely with each other on features and price. (You can always take the advice offered here and apply it to other manufacturers' offerings.)

Canon and Nikon both offer a range of DSLRs from entry level to professional. Let's look at four basic categories of camera from each manufacturer:
  • Entry level: This is the most affordable DSLR in the range. An entry level DSLR is a significant step up from any compact digital camera. If you want a capable camera, but photography is not your main hobby or your job, then an entry level DSLR will give you the most bang for your buck. You can get started with a camera and a lens for about $500.
  • Enthusiast: Each manufacturer makes a number of progressively more advanced models for people who enjoy photography as a hobby and are interested in specific features. This category contains the most camera models. Prices range from $500 to $1,700 for the camera body (without lens).
  • Full frame: A "full frame" camera has a sensor the same size as a 35mm film frame. This means that the photographer can take full advantage of the same lenses used on professional cameras, especially wide angle lenses. If you need this capability, you know who you are. Prices are around $2,500 to $3,200.
  • Professional: These cameras are designed for full time photojournalists and studio photographers. They are more durable, weatherproof, and capable. Prices are around $5,000 to $7,500.
So let's look at the current lineup of Canon and Nikon cameras in these categories in more detail, as of September 2009:

Entry level cameras

The entry level DSLRs from Canon and Nikon are:
Both of these cameras are great value for money and a big step up from comparably priced compact cameras.

My advice: if you have no specific interest in photography as a serious hobby or profession, you have no reason to look beyond this category. 10 megapixels are sufficient for prints at least up to 12"x18". And unless you can invest real effort in learning and practice, a better camera won't make you a better photographer.

Enthusiast cameras

The enthusiast DSLRs from Canon are:
  • Canon 500D: 15 megapixels; adds 14-bit files, 920k pixel display, and depth of field preview; about $700.
  • Canon 50D: adds a pentaprism and 6.3 fps shooting; about $1,000.
  • Canon 7D: 18 megapixels, 8fps, and better pentaprism; about $1,700.
The enthusiast DSLRs from Nikon are:
  • Nikon D5000: 13 megapixels; adds live view; about $600.
  • Nikon D90: adds a pentaprism, 920k pixel display, and depth of field preview; about $900.
  • Nikon D300: adds 14-bit files and 6 fps; about $1,700.
Some of the features these cameras have to offer are: more resolution (15 or 18 megapixels); greater bit depth for more shadow detail (14-bit files instead of 12-bit files from an entry level camera); a more detailed display screen (with 920,000 pixels instead of the 230,000 in an entry level camera); a bigger brighter viewfinder (pentaprism instead of pentamirror); a button for depth of field preview; and faster shooting for moving subjects such as sports (6.3 or 8 frames per second instead of about 3 in an entry level camera). Of course there are other feature differences between these cameras that may be more important to you.

My advice: the capabilities are actually pretty similar despite the significant price differences, so don't get sucked into spending two or three times as much on a camera, just for one or two features. Also, be aware that to get the full benefit of resolution over 15 megapixels, you'll need professional quality lenses in the $1,000 range.

Full frame cameras

The full frame, non-professional DSLRs from Canon and Nikon are:
  • Canon 5D Mark II: 21 megapixels, 4 fps, up to ISO 25,600; about $3,200.
  • Nikon D700: 12 megapixels, 5 fps, up to ISO 25,600; about $2,500.
Because of their larger sensors, these cameras perform better in low light. They exhibit less noise at high ISO and can shoot up to ISO 25,600 (although ISO 3,200 is the practical upper limit for most purposes).

My advice: this category is worth the extra cost if (but only if) you know your specific style of photography will benefit from the greater access to lenses that it brings -- specifically, if you need the highest quality wide angle lenses -- or if you make extensive use of selective focus. And if you plan to make money from your photography, this category is a bargain compared to professional cameras with similar capabilities.

Professional cameras

If you need a professional camera, you know who you are and you don't need this guide. But just for comparison, here are three professional cameras from Canon and Nikon:
Sources
More guidance from other sites:

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Photos | India in motion

 
Sometimes it's helpful to set some images aside and come back to them a while later. In January 2008 I was in India and took a lot of photos that I thought of as "just travel photos" at the time.
In reviewing them now I'm struck by how different they are from my other photography. But I can also see that they should be different. For a "Western" visitor, India is a very "different" place in so many ways. Historically, culturally, religiously -- those are obvious. But less expected is the pace.
As a visitor to India you tend to start out in cities. And those cities are far more dense and vibrant than any Western city I can think of. As Joe said, after being in Mumbai, you go to Manhattan and wonder, "where is everyone?" Just stepping out onto the sidewalk in the morning, the sense of activity is nearly overwhelming at first. Learning to cross the street is an adventure.
So it makes sense that I would end up with a lot of images about motion. Quite a few of them were even taken in motion, from car windows. Obviously we visited quiet and contemplative places in India too. But these pictures of India in motion are what really stands out to me from the trip.